(Side Note: In rating agencies, primary objective is to evaluate agencies’ responses to various issues. Responses are a crucial ingredient for agencies’ and groups’ survival, fame, and profitability.
Communication skills will be added as another criterion to further emphasize the foregoing point. Finally, the following only covers the whole of 2020:)
Quality over quantity has been a philosophy of YG. But while this was true in the golden age of KPop, this is not applicable today.
It came to a point where BLACKPINK members had to throw shade over YG several times. It also came to a point where some Blinks have to do it just to wake the agency from slumber. These things are the norm for YG, and the same method is continuously earning ire from fans.
YG must’ve forgotten to increase both quantity and quality. Just look at the number of lead tracks provided for its groups and soloists, and it’s quite miserable. (As is the case with BIGBANG, even if they renewed contract, still has no releases to date.) Furthermore, YG should’ve aimed for quality > streams as compared to present outlook where quality < streams.
It is to be noted further that some YG stans don’t want to improve this dismal situation. Being fixated on the mindset that Big 3 is only YG-JYP-SM and nothing else, and being hostile on moves to add BigHit to the mix, they’re giving YG impression that it can be complacent on changes in K-Pop scene.
Crucial also to further success of YG and its artists is on giving them power over creativity and content, not stifling them, idling around, or just placing talents on a specific mold. This is apparent over rapper One’s departure, Lee Hi parting ways, Katie Kim leaving the agency after lack of releases, AKMU not fully promoted this year, usual fewer content for Somi, and Rosé not being given solo activity despite pleas from Blinks.
Some good points are also noted. First is on retaining what B.I. left via iKON’s recent comeback. Second point is on involving Lisa as judge in Youth With You. Third is on being receptive to criticisms and shades thrown at them (plus issuing immediately statements for BP and WINNER). Fourth is on giving update on Junhoe and Jinhwan, plus on BP’s solo undertakings. Fourth is on pursuing legal actions on death threats against the Thai artist. Fifth is on making up for mistakes by giving additional content, as is the case with BP and WINNER.
Final positive aspect was on change of leadership. But we’ll have to see how far this new leadership will change the face of YG.
In the end, it’s too early to tell that YG improved, noting their poor performance in prior years. But if they improved substantially next year, we might ditch the term Big 3 + YG in favor of Big 4.
Group(s) Rated: BLACKPINK
Rating: 76.67%
Grade: F
Assessment: Failed
% Change: +5.76%
Criterion | Points | Base | |
1 | Promotion of groups | 5 | 5 |
2 | Rolling of comebacks | 4 | 5 |
3 | Handling boy groups | 3 | 5 |
4 | Handling girl groups | 3 | 5 |
5 | Assessment as whole | 5 | 10 |
6 | Longevity of groups | 9 | 10 |
7 | Handling issues and responding | 7 | 10 |
8 | Communication skills | 5 | 5 |
9 | Secondary frontline service | 5 | 5 |